🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I usually avoided significant use of randomization during my D&D adventures. I tended was for the plot and session development to be determined by player choice instead of pure luck. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm incredibly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Watching an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show showcases a DM who frequently requests "chance rolls" from the players. The process entails picking a type of die and defining possible results based on the result. It's fundamentally no distinct from rolling on a pre-generated chart, these are devised in the moment when a player's action lacks a clear resolution.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, mainly because it seemed novel and presented a departure from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the ongoing tension between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful In-Game Example

At a session, my group had just emerged from a large-scale conflict. Afterwards, a player asked about two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Instead of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply emotional scene where the party found the corpses of their companions, forever united in death. The group held last rites, which was particularly significant due to earlier roleplaying. As a parting reward, I decided that the forms were suddenly restored, showing a spell-storing object. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was precisely what the group needed to resolve another major situation. You simply plan this type of magical moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This event caused me to question if chance and thinking on your feet are actually the beating heart of this game. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players reliably find joy in ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate scenarios in real-time.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these skills without going completely outside your comfort zone. The strategy is to apply them for minor situations that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. As an example, I would not employ it to establish if the main villain is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to determine if the characters arrive moments before a critical event occurs.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also helps maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the story is responsive, shaping according to their actions immediately. It combats the sense that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of the game.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. The game's roots were filled with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. While modern D&D frequently prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the required method.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

Absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. However, there is also no problem with stepping back and permitting the dice to decide some things rather than you. Control is a big aspect of a DM's job. We need it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

The core recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Experiment with a little chance for minor outcomes. You might just create that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you would have planned by yourself.